When the victim is under 16, investigators must determine if age was known or should have been known by whom?

Study for the Wisconsin 720 Law Enforcement Academy Phase III Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Each question has hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Multiple Choice

When the victim is under 16, investigators must determine if age was known or should have been known by whom?

Explanation:
The main concept is that age of a minor can be a controlling factor in liability, so investigators must assess the defendant’s knowledge of the victim’s age. When the victim is under 16, what the defender knew or should have known about the victim’s age matters for determining guilt. Evidence about the defender’s awareness or reasonable opportunity to verify age helps establish whether the proper mens rea or defense applies. Investigators look for clues such as statements about age, requests for identification, or circumstances that would have prompted a reasonable person to know the victim’s age. The other parties—the victim, the arresting officer, or emergency services—don’t determine this mental state for the defendant.

The main concept is that age of a minor can be a controlling factor in liability, so investigators must assess the defendant’s knowledge of the victim’s age. When the victim is under 16, what the defender knew or should have known about the victim’s age matters for determining guilt. Evidence about the defender’s awareness or reasonable opportunity to verify age helps establish whether the proper mens rea or defense applies. Investigators look for clues such as statements about age, requests for identification, or circumstances that would have prompted a reasonable person to know the victim’s age. The other parties—the victim, the arresting officer, or emergency services—don’t determine this mental state for the defendant.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy